Beta RR 400 2009 vs. Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Beta RR 400 2009

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013
Loading...
Technical Specifications Beta RR 400 2009 compared to Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013
Beta RR 400 2009
Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013
Engine and Drive Train
| Bore | Bore | 89 mm | Bore | 54 mm |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stroke | Stroke | 64 mm | Stroke | 54.5 mm |
| Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Kick |
| Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
| Displacement | Displacement | 398 ccm | Displacement | 124 ccm |
Brakes Front
| Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
|---|
Brakes Rear
| Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
|---|
Dimensions and Weights
| Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 21 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 18 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
| Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,500 mm | Wheelbase | 1,470 mm |
| Seat Height | Seat Height | 940 mm | Seat Height | 870 mm |
| Dry Weight | Dry Weight | 117.5 kg | Dry Weight | 113.5 kg |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 8.5 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 9.5 l |



















