Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010 vs. Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010

Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Loading...

Overview - Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010 vs Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010

Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Technical Specifications Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010 compared to Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Beta Evo 125 2T My10 2010
Husqvarna SM 125 S 2013

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke54 mmStroke54.5 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio14 Compression Ratio8.8
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Rear tyre widthRear tyre width40 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height18 %Rear tyre height60 %
WheelbaseWheelbase1,305 mmWheelbase1,470 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height660 mmSeat Height870 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight68 kgDry Weight113.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity2.6 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH