Husqvarna WR 300 2013 vs. Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna WR 300 2013 vs Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 300 2013 compared to Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husqvarna WR 300 2013
Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement293 ccmDisplacement449 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,490 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height975 mmSeat Height930 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight103 kgDry Weight109 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.5 lFuel Tank Capacity9 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

A powerful engine in a fine enduro moped. Straight-line stability is very good in the deep and heavy sand. Even if you don't keep perfect traction, the front wheel holds the line cleanly in the deep sand. A real advantage, especially for less experienced enduro riders.

Fine board computer with digital speedometer

plenty of power and torque

perfect stability.

Some details seem to have been saved.

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH