Husqvarna WR 300 2013 vs. Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 300 2013 compared to Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Engine and Drive Train

Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	293 ccm	Displacement	449 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,465 mm	Wheelbase	1,490 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	975 mm	Seat Height	930 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	103 kg	Dry Weight	109 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	9 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna WR 300 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

A powerful engine in a fine enduro moped. Straight-line stability is very good in the deep and heavy sand. Even if you don't keep perfect traction, the front wheel holds the line cleanly in the deep sand. A real advantage, especially for less experienced enduro riders.

Fine board computer with digital speedometer

plenty of power and torque

perfect stability.

Some details seem to have been saved.