BMW R nineT 2014 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2024

BMW R nineT 2014

BMW R nineT 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2024

BMW S 1000 R 2024

Loading...

Overview - BMW R nineT 2014 vs BMW S 1000 R 2024

BMW R nineT 2014

BMW R nineT 2014

BMW S 1000 R 2024

BMW S 1000 R 2024

Technical Specifications BMW R nineT 2014 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2024

BMW R nineT 2014
BMW S 1000 R 2024

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeBoxerEngine typeIn line
BoreBore101 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke73 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power110 HPEngine power165 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,750 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque119 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeToughened, DryClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingOil-airCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement1,170 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionParaleverSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonSingle piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,220 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth890 mmWidth812 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,476 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height785 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)222 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)199 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity16.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW R nineT 2014

BMW R nineT 2014

Very worthy retro machine. The other classic manufacturers really need to catch up.

Optics, engine, fork, workmanship

A touch too little rebound damping in the shock absorber

BMW S 1000 R 2024

BMW S 1000 R 2024

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW R nineT vs BMW S 1000 R

Price BMW R nineT

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH