Husqvarna TE 510 2009 vs. SWM RS 300 R 2018

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

SWM RS 300 R 2018

SWM RS 300 R 2018

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 510 2009 vs SWM RS 300 R 2018

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

SWM RS 300 R 2018

SWM RS 300 R 2018

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 510 2009 compared to SWM RS 300 R 2018

Husqvarna TE 510 2009
SWM RS 300 R 2018

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore97 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke55 mm
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement510 ccmDisplacement298 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandSachsBrandKayaba

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandSachsBrandKayaba

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height963 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight112 kgDry Weight107 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 510 vs SWM RS 300 R

Price Husqvarna TE 510

Model year
Current average market prices

Price SWM RS 300 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH