Husqvarna TE 510 2009 vs. BMW F 650 GS 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

BMW F 650 GS 2009

BMW F 650 GS 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 510 2009 compared to BMW F 650 GS 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009
BMW F 650 GS 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore97 mmBore82 mm
StrokeStroke67.8 mmStroke75.6 mm
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric
DisplacementDisplacement510 ccmDisplacement798 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,575 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height820 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW F 650 GS 2009

BMW F 650 GS 2009

When it comes to optional extras, accessories and driver equipment, BMW is the benchmark for us. The driver can have his vehicle configured exactly to his wishes and also order the matching clothing at the same time.

Manoeuvrability

agility

low seat height can be reduced again

heated grips

comfortable seat

resale value.

Wind protection somewhat suboptimal compared to the F800.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 510 vs BMW F 650 GS

Price Husqvarna TE 510

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 650 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH