Husaberg FE 450 E 2005 vs. Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husaberg FE 450 E 2005 vs Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Technical Specifications Husaberg FE 450 E 2005 compared to Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005
Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Engine and Drive Train

CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement449 ccmDisplacement293 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,490 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height930 mmSeat Height975 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight109 kgDry Weight104 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

Husaberg FE 450 E 2005

A powerful engine in a fine enduro moped. Straight-line stability is very good in the deep and heavy sand. Even if you don't keep perfect traction, the front wheel holds the line cleanly in the deep sand. A real advantage, especially for less experienced enduro riders.

Fine board computer with digital speedometer

plenty of power and torque

perfect stability.

Some details seem to have been saved.

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Husqvarna WR 300 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH