Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 vs. Yamaha Tracer 900 2017

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020

Yamaha Tracer 900 2017

Yamaha Tracer 900 2017

Loading...

Overview - Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 vs Yamaha Tracer 900 2017

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020

Yamaha Tracer 900 2017

Yamaha Tracer 900 2017

Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020 compared to Yamaha Tracer 900 2017

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020
Yamaha Tracer 900 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore78 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke86 mmStroke59.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power24.5 HPEngine power115 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power6,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpm
TorqueTorque32 NmTorque87.5 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,000 rpmRpm at Torque8,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio9.5 Compression Ratio11.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears5Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders3
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesOHVValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement411 ccmDisplacement847 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradleFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeSingle diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,190 mmLength2,160 mm
WidthWidth840 mmWidth950 mm
HeightHeight1,360 mmHeight1,345 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,440 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height845 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020

Royal Enfield Himalayan 2020

The workmanship is of a surprisingly high standard for a motorbike that can be had in Germany and Austria for under 5,000 euros. Everything about the little Himalayan looks like it was built to last. Of course, the little Indian can't compete with others in terms of performance data, but it doesn't want to. It is a motorbike for individualists who want to escape society's higher, faster, further - deceleration of the first order.

unique eye-catcher

coherent concept

high range

comfortable seat

compass

robust technology

price-performance ratio

Front brake subterranean

performance somewhat weak for Europe

weight relatively high

Yamaha Tracer 900 2017

Yamaha Tracer 900 2017

Take two, pay one. With the MT-09 Tracer, you get almost a whole MT-09 with all its sportiness plus a touring bike that is suitable for everyday use and to some extent suitable for travelling, with decent comfort for all situations. Just remember that there are many more comfortable bikes in this category - but hardly any sportier ones. Easier to ride, easier to control with 3 riding modes, ABS and traction control as standard. Only the wind protection could be better and the seat for long distances can only be found in the accessories.

Sporty performance like all MT-09

3 riding modes

ABS and traction control as standard

taut chassis, plenty of lean angle clearance

Wind protection not optimal

seat could be more comfortable

handlebars too wide for the city

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Royal Enfield Himalayan vs Yamaha Tracer 900

Price Royal Enfield Himalayan

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Yamaha Tracer 900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH