Husqvarna SM 610 2005 vs. BMW G 650 Xmoto 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

BMW G 650 Xmoto 2009

BMW G 650 Xmoto 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2005 compared to BMW G 650 Xmoto 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2005
BMW G 650 Xmoto 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power60 HPEngine power53 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement576 ccmDisplacement652 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,500 mmWheelbase1,500 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height920 mmSeat Height900 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.5 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

Husqvarna SM 610 2005

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

BMW G 650 Xmoto 2009

BMW G 650 Xmoto 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH