Kawasaki Z 750R 2012 vs. Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Kawasaki Z 750R 2012

Kawasaki Z 750R 2012

Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z 750R 2012 vs Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Kawasaki Z 750R 2012

Kawasaki Z 750R 2012

Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z 750R 2012 compared to Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Kawasaki Z 750R 2012
Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore68.4 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power125 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpm
TorqueTorque78 NmTorque104 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,300 rpmRpm at Torque4,300 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.3 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement748 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork
AdjustmentAdjustmentReboundAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentReboundAdjustmentCompression, Rebound

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradial, PetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,150 mm
WidthWidth795 mmWidth835 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,540 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight227 kgKerb Weight235 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18.5 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z 750R 2012

Kawasaki Z 750R 2012

All in all, the tuning here has been really fine-tuned and precise. For your money, you get a really good naked bike racer with an optimal price/performance ratio that is easy to ride and achieves fast lap times. If you then dismantle the parts after a few years, you can sell the vehicle very easily on the second-hand market - the Z750 R is very popular there.

Well-designed appearance

stable chassis

footrests offer perfect support

efficient frame cover.

Clean engine tuning with a power commander was not carried out.

Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

Triumph Tiger Sport 2016

The Tiger Sport is a riding machine that can do much more than promised in the brochure. It was sportier than I thought it would be, but at the same time it offered more riding comfort.

Very universal

very agile handling but still easy and safe to drive

high ride comfort

great price / performance ratio

great tuned engine.

The Tiger Sport succeeds in almost all areas. Only in the suspension setup is the compromise, which is what this vehicle is, noticeable in some situations.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z 750R vs Triumph Tiger Sport

Price Kawasaki Z 750R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Tiger Sport

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH