Kawasaki Z 750 2009 vs. Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z 750 2009 compared to Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Kawasaki Z 750 2009
Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore68.4 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke54.5 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement748 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Brakes Front

TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyWave

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,465 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height975 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18.5 lFuel Tank Capacity7 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z 750 2009

Kawasaki Z 750 2009

A good bike at a very good price, especially the upside-down fork is convincing.

improved torque curve

upside-down fork

aggressive engine

low price

high weight

4 hp less than the predecessor

not exactly effortless driving

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z 750 vs Husqvarna WR 125

Price Kawasaki Z 750

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna WR 125

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons