Beta Alp 200 2009 vs. Montesa Cota 4RT 2016

Beta Alp 200 2009

Beta Alp 200 2009

Montesa Cota 4RT 2016

Montesa Cota 4RT 2016

Loading...

Overview - Beta Alp 200 2009 vs Montesa Cota 4RT 2016

Beta Alp 200 2009

Beta Alp 200 2009

Montesa Cota 4RT 2016

Montesa Cota 4RT 2016

Technical Specifications Beta Alp 200 2009 compared to Montesa Cota 4RT 2016

Beta Alp 200 2009
Montesa Cota 4RT 2016

Engine and Drive Train

StrokeStroke80 mmStroke54.2 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio9.4 Compression Ratio10.5
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement199 ccmDisplacement259 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

LengthLength2,150 mmLength2,016 mm
WidthWidth820 mmWidth830 mm
HeightHeight340 mmHeight1,130 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,350 mmWheelbase1,321 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height850 mmSeat Height650 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight101 kgDry Weight73 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity6.8 lFuel Tank Capacity1.9 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta Alp 200 vs Montesa Cota 4RT

Price Beta Alp 200

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Montesa Cota 4RT

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH