Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough 2020 vs. Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 2024

Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough 2020

Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 2024
Technical Specifications Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough 2020 compared to Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 2024
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | V | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 80 mm | Bore | 78 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 74 mm | Stroke | 67.8 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 52 HP | Engine power | 47 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 6,200 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,250 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 60 Nm | Torque | 52.3 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 4,900 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 5,650 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 10.5 | Compression Ratio | 9.5 |
Fuel system | Fuel system | Injection | Fuel system | Injection |
Starter | Starter | Electric | Starter | Electric |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Toughened, Dry | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 2 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Cooling | Cooling | Air | Cooling | Oil-air |
Displacement | Displacement | 744 ccm | Displacement | 648 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Telescopic fork | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
---|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Brand | Marzocchi | Brand | Showa |
Travel | Travel | 130 mm | Travel | 120 mm |
Suspension Rear
Shock absorber | Shock absorber | Dual Shock | Shock absorber | Dual Shock |
---|---|---|---|---|
Brand | Brand | Marzocchi | Brand | Showa |
Travel | Travel | 93 mm | Travel | 90 mm |
Adjustment | Adjustment | Preload | Adjustment | Preload |
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Steel |
---|
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Single disk | Type | Single disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 320 mm | Diameter | 320 mm |
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Double piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Diameter | Diameter | 260 mm | Diameter | 300 mm |
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 100 mm | Front tyre width | 100 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 90 % | Front tyre height | 90 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 18 inch | Front tyre diameter | 18 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 130 mm | Rear tyre width | 150 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 80 % | Rear tyre height | 70 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,185 mm | Length | 2,220 mm |
Width | Width | 800 mm | Width | 820 mm |
Height | Height | 1,100 mm | Height | 1,105 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,145 mm | Wheelbase | 1,465 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 770 mm | Seat Height | 795 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 21 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 13.8 l |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Moto Guzzi V7 III Rough 2020

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Royal Enfield Shotgun 650 2024

Deceleration on two wheels with heart and character. It is a bike for anyone who wants to feel the wind, enjoy the landscape and unwind. With its relaxed power, classic cruiser look and solid workmanship, it captures the hearts of purists who are looking for the original.
Relaxed riding comfort
Classic cruiser design
Solid workmanship
Strong riding experience
Favourable price
Modern features (USB, LED lights)
Easy handling
Comfortable seating position for long rides
Above-average fuel consumption
Limited luggage options
Weak front brakes
Uncomfortable knee angle on long journeys
Heavy weight when manoeuvring
Under-damped suspension on poor tarmac