ChigeeContinental Motorradreifencalimoto GmbHMotorex AG

KTM 625 SMC 2005 vs. Husqvarna TE 630 2012

KTM 625 SMC 2005

KTM 625 SMC 2005

Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Loading...

Overview - KTM 625 SMC 2005 vs Husqvarna TE 630 2012

KTM 625 SMC 2005

KTM 625 SMC 2005

Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Technical Specifications KTM 625 SMC 2005 compared to Husqvarna TE 630 2012

KTM 625 SMC 2005
Husqvarna TE 630 2012
KTM 625 SMC 2005
KTM 625 SMC 2005
Husqvarna TE 630 2012
Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement625 ccmDisplacement600 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,510 mmWheelbase1,485 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height910 mmSeat Height945 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight146 kgDry Weight150 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity9.2 lFuel Tank Capacity12 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 625 SMC 2005

KTM 625 SMC 2005

For power freaks, the KTM 625SMC is an excellent compromise in road use. The iron marches splendidly, has an e-start, reasonable service intervals and also offers some comfort. In terms of handling and agility, it can't quite keep up with the two lightweights 450 Husky and 650 Berg.

Steel rear

approved for 2 persons

suitable for everyday use

e-starter

high-quality details

comfort.

The already old headlight mask is a bit boring

Nothing for beginners

A bit heavier than racing supermotos

Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Husqvarna TE 630 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH