Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012 vs. BMW G 650 Xmoto 2007

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

BMW G 650 Xmoto 2007

BMW G 650 Xmoto 2007

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012 vs BMW G 650 Xmoto 2007

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

BMW G 650 Xmoto 2007

BMW G 650 Xmoto 2007

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012 compared to BMW G 650 Xmoto 2007

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012
BMW G 650 Xmoto 2007

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement477 ccmDisplacement652 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,500 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height915 mmSeat Height920 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight118 kgDry Weight147 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8.5 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 511 R 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW G 650 Xmoto 2007

BMW G 650 Xmoto 2007

The Xmoto is severely underrated. With the right bank balance, the choice for an inner-city fun bike. Looks extraordinary, has no one, knows no one, goes well and lasts a long time. It would be nice if all the parts of the Xmoto were closer to each other and didn't diverge between soft and extreme. Simply a more coherent concept.

Stability

precision

quality workmanship

clear, uncluttered lines

firm, comfortable chassis.

Braking abrupt and numb

Individual components diverge between soft-flushed and extremely hard

Alternative Comparisons