Suzuki GSX-R 600 2010 vs. Triumph Daytona 675 2010

Suzuki GSX-R 600 2010

Triumph Daytona 675 2010
Loading...
Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-R 600 2010 compared to Triumph Daytona 675 2010
Suzuki GSX-R 600 2010
Triumph Daytona 675 2010
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 67 mm | Bore | 74 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 42.5 mm | Stroke | 52.3 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 125 HP | Engine power | 126 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 13,500 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 12,500 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 68.6 Nm | Torque | 72 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 11,500 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 11,750 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12.8 | Compression Ratio | 12.65 |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 4 | Cylinders | 3 |
Valves | Valves | DOHC | Valves | DOHC |
Displacement | Displacement | 599 ccm | Displacement | 675 ccm |
Suspension Front
Adjustment | Adjustment | Compression, Preload, Rebound | Adjustment | Compression, Rebound |
---|
Suspension Rear
Adjustment | Adjustment | Compression, Preload, Rebound | Adjustment | Compression, Rebound |
---|
Chassis
Frame type | Frame type | Twin-Spar | Frame type | Twin Tube |
---|
Brakes Front
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
---|
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Single piston |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 180 mm | Rear tyre width | 180 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,040 mm | Length | 2,010 mm |
Width | Width | 715 mm | Width | 710 mm |
Height | Height | 1,125 mm | Height | 1,120 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,400 mm | Wheelbase | 1,415 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 810 mm | Seat Height | 830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.4 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
Suzuki GSX-R 600 2010

The new bike is definitely not just a model update, but a noticeably better overall concept, even for hobby riders, which is more enjoyable than any previous 600.
Relatively low overall weight
easy handling
good-sounding power unit
precise braking system
quiet, stable chassis.
Somewhat suboptimal in the high rev range
inappropriate design.
Triumph Daytona 675 2010

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-R 600 vs Triumph Daytona 675
Price Suzuki GSX-R 600
Model year
Current average market prices
Price Triumph Daytona 675
Model year
Current average market prices