Kawasaki Z 750 2011 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2012

Kawasaki Z 750 2011

Kawasaki Z 750 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2012

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2012

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki Z 750 2011 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2012

Kawasaki Z 750 2011

Kawasaki Z 750 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2012

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2012

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z 750 2011 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2012

Kawasaki Z 750 2011
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore68.4 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power106 HPEngine power135 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,400 rpm
TorqueTorque78 NmTorque111 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,300 rpmRpm at Torque7,750 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.3 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders3
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement748 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
LengthLength2,085 mmLength2,100 mm
WidthWidth805 mmWidth795 mm
HeightHeight1,100 mmHeight1,110 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,435 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height825 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)230 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)214 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18.5 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z 750 2011

Kawasaki Z 750 2011

A good bike at a very good price, especially the upside-down fork is convincing.

improved torque curve

upside-down fork

aggressive engine

low price

high weight

4 hp less than the predecessor

not exactly effortless driving

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2012

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2012

More power, more kilos, more rubber . It is certainly not the most manageable, which makes climbing the Tyrolean mountains over hundreds of hairpin bends exhausting at times. But it is more mature than the Street Triple, knows how to glide along the valley smoothly and without getting on your nerves, and for some reason feels more trustworthy and secure.

Powerful three-cylinder engine

sporty driving feel

upright seating

stable frame.

Showa suspension elements slightly uncomfortable

stubborn handling.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z 750 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Price Kawasaki Z 750

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH