Husqvarna WR 125 2009 vs. BMW R nineT 2016

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

BMW R nineT 2016

BMW R nineT 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna WR 125 2009 compared to BMW R nineT 2016

Husqvarna WR 125 2009
BMW R nineT 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore101 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke73 mm
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingOil-air
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement1,170 ccm

Brakes Front

TechnologyTechnologyWaveTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,465 mmWheelbase1,476 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height975 mmSeat Height785 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7 lFuel Tank Capacity17 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Husqvarna WR 125 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

BMW R nineT 2016

BMW R nineT 2016

With the RnineT, BMW has created a monument to itself and the boxer that has made it into many garages around the world. The R nineT is a best-seller thanks to its successful overall concept and has served numerous customisers as the basis for a wide range of conversions. Compared to a Thruxton, however, the BMW does not appear authentic in all details, and on the poor road surfaces in the Alps, the suspension may be tuned too hard or the exhaust may be too loud in the long run.

solid technology

strong brakes

unique look

rich sound

fat torque

Hard tuning for bad roads

exhaust a bit loud in the long run

not 100% authentic

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna WR 125 vs BMW R nineT

Price Husqvarna WR 125

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW R nineT

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons