Kawasaki GTR 1400 2011 vs. Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

Kawasaki GTR 1400 2011

Kawasaki GTR 1400 2011

Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki GTR 1400 2011 compared to Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

Kawasaki GTR 1400 2011
Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power154 HPEngine power72 HP
TransmissionTransmissionProp shaftTransmissionChain
DisplacementDisplacement1,352 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,520 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height785 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity22 lFuel Tank Capacity15.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki GTR 1400 2011

Kawasaki GTR 1400 2011

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

The ER-6f will also be available in Austria as a light motorbike - although young people will tend to go for the cooler ER-6n. Both models, however, are motorbikes that are fun to ride for more than just a few months. The engine is particularly suitable for beginners. There is no need to compromise on comfort, throttle response and load change behaviour.

Comfortable cruising speed up to 180km/h

surprisingly powerful

bold looks

decent build quality

easy handling

great braking system

ABS.

Power flattens out too quickly at very high speed

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki GTR 1400 vs Kawasaki ER-6f

Price Kawasaki GTR 1400

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6f

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH