Beta RR 300 2T 2023 vs. Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012

Technical Specifications Beta RR 300 2T 2023 compared to Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012

Beta RR 300 2T 2023

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012

Show all

Same only

Differences

Beta RR 300 2T 2023

Husqvarna SM 125 S 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	73 mm	Bore	54 mm
Stroke	Stroke	69.9 mm	Stroke	54.5 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	11.6	Compression Ratio	8.8
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Kick
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	2-Stroke	Strokes	2-Stroke
Displacement	Displacement	292.3 ccm	Displacement	124 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Front

Piston	Piston	Double piston	Piston	Double piston

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	110 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	70 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	150 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	80 %	Rear tyre height	60 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,482 mm	Wheelbase	1,470 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	930 mm	Seat Height	870 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	103.5 kg	Dry Weight	113.5 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.5 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	9.5 l