BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. Kawasaki KVF 650 A1 4x4 2009

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

Kawasaki KVF 650 A1 4x4 2009

Kawasaki KVF 650 A1 4x4 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2016 compared to Kawasaki KVF 650 A1 4x4 2009

BMW S 1000 R 2016
Kawasaki KVF 650 A1 4x4 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke63 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio9.9
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement633 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WidthWidth845 mmWidth910 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity18 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

Kawasaki KVF 650 A1 4x4 2009

Kawasaki KVF 650 A1 4x4 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs Kawasaki KVF 650 A1 4x4

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki KVF 650 A1 4x4

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.