Honda CBR 600 F 2012 vs. Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Honda CBR 600 F 2012

Honda CBR 600 F 2012

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Honda CBR 600 F 2012 compared to Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Honda CBR 600 F 2012
Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
Honda CBR 600 F 2012
Honda CBR 600 F 2012
Kawasaki ER-6f 2009
Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore67 mmBore83 mm
StrokeStroke42.5 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power102 HPEngine power72 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power12,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpm
TorqueTorque64 NmTorque66 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque10,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.3
IgnitionIgnitionDigital, TransistorIgnitionDigital
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement599 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height785 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18.4 lFuel Tank Capacity15.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Honda CBR 600 F 2012

Honda CBR 600 F 2012

The CBR600F remains just under the magic 10,000 mark and certainly doesn't disgrace Honda's mid-range. For a modest 520 euro surcharge until the end of May, it also comes with a tempting additional package consisting of a dark-tinted windshield, painted pillion seat and rear wheel cover, tank cap decor, tank pad and crankcase decor set.

Comfort

acceptable performance

comfortable riding position

padded saddle

C-ABS.

Tachometer difficult to read

lack of gear indicator.

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Kawasaki ER-6f 2009

Regardless of whether you take it on the dull way to work or on extended tours, the comfortable seating position, the quiet, low-vibration in-line two-cylinder and the agility in the angular movement bring riding pleasure in every situation.

Powerful sound

mobility

reasonable price

visually sophisticated

safe riding experience

(re-)beginner-friendly.

72 hp does not tear legs out

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Honda CBR 600 F vs Kawasaki ER-6f

Price Honda CBR 600 F

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6f

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Honda CBR 650F 2018
VS.
Honda CBR 600 F 2014

Honda CBR 650F 2018 vs
Honda CBR 600 F 2014

Kawasaki ER-6f 2011
VS.
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2018

Kawasaki ER-6f 2011 vs
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2018

Honda CBR 600 F 2006
VS.
Honda CBR 600 RR 2006

Honda CBR 600 F 2006 vs
Honda CBR 600 RR 2006

Kawasaki ER-6f 2010
VS.
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020

Kawasaki ER-6f 2010 vs
Kawasaki Ninja 650 2020

Honda CBR 600 F 2005
VS.
Honda CBR650R 2021

Honda CBR 600 F 2005 vs
Honda CBR650R 2021

Honda CBR650R 2020
VS.
Honda CBR 600 F 2014

Honda CBR650R 2020 vs
Honda CBR 600 F 2014

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6f 2015

Kawasaki Ninja 650 2017 vs
Kawasaki ER-6f 2015

Honda CBR 600 F 2005
VS.
Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005

Honda CBR 600 F 2005 vs
Honda CB 600 F Hornet 2005

Honda CBR 600 F 2007
VS.
Honda CBR 600 RR 2009

Honda CBR 600 F 2007 vs
Honda CBR 600 RR 2009

Kawasaki ER-6f 2014
VS.
Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016

Kawasaki ER-6f 2014 vs
Kawasaki Z1000SX 2016

Honda VFR 800 F 2020
VS.
Honda CBR 600 F 2011

Honda VFR 800 F 2020 vs
Honda CBR 600 F 2011

Honda CBR 650F 2018
VS.
Honda CBR 600 F 2005

Honda CBR 650F 2018 vs
Honda CBR 600 F 2005