BMW F 800 R 2010 vs. Triumph Street Twin 2016

BMW F 800 R 2010

BMW F 800 R 2010

Triumph Street Twin 2016

Triumph Street Twin 2016

Loading...

Overview - BMW F 800 R 2010 vs Triumph Street Twin 2016

BMW F 800 R 2010

BMW F 800 R 2010

Triumph Street Twin 2016

Triumph Street Twin 2016

Technical Specifications BMW F 800 R 2010 compared to Triumph Street Twin 2016

BMW F 800 R 2010
Triumph Street Twin 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore82 mmBore84.6 mm
StrokeStroke75.6 mmStroke80 mm
Engine powerEngine power87 HPEngine power55 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power5,900 rpm
TorqueTorque86 NmTorque80 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,000 rpmRpm at Torque3,230 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio10.55
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears5
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement798 ccmDisplacement900 ccm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin Tube, Load-bearing engineFrame typeCentral tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width100 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height70 %
WidthWidth905 mmWidth785 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,520 mmWheelbase1,415 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height800 mmSeat Height750 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity16 lFuel Tank Capacity12 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW F 800 R 2010

BMW F 800 R 2010

In the advertisements, the new BMW F 800 R sometimes comes across as a woman's motorbike. This does not do the bike an injustice, but the civilised engine, the low seat height and the smooth controls certainly suit petite ladies.

High-quality components

great engine

good equipment possible

cockpit

positive chassis

low consumption.

High price

first gear a little too long

optics.

Triumph Street Twin 2016

Triumph Street Twin 2016

The Triumph Street Twin is a pleasure bike par excellence, whose 55 hp engine impressively proves what really matters, namely torque. And exactly where you need it, in the middle of the rev range. 80 Nm push the 217 kg motorbike forward with pleasant pressure and never tempt the rider to overtax the engine, i.e. to rev it. In terms of design, Triumph remained authentic as usual and offers countless possibilities for customisation with over 450 accessories and the three "Inspiration Packs". A lesson in modern classics.

excellently tuned engine

high torque

low consumption

authentic design

good quality and clean workmanship

Basic shape (without accessories) somewhat sober

chassis and brakes reach their limits in sporty use

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 800 R vs Triumph Street Twin

Price BMW F 800 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Street Twin

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH