BMW F 650 GS 2012 vs. BMW F 800 GS 2016

BMW F 650 GS 2012

BMW F 800 GS 2016
Loading...
Technical Specifications BMW F 650 GS 2012 compared to BMW F 800 GS 2016
BMW F 650 GS 2012
BMW F 800 GS 2016
Engine and Drive Train
Bore | Bore | 82 mm | Bore | 82 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Stroke | Stroke | 75.6 mm | Stroke | 75.6 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 71 HP | Engine power | 86 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,000 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 7,500 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 75 Nm | Torque | 83 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 4,500 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 5,750 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 12 | Compression Ratio | 12 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath |
Transmission | Transmission | Chain | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 2 | Cylinders | 2 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Lubrication | Lubrication | Dry sump | Lubrication | Dry sump |
Displacement | Displacement | 798 ccm | Displacement | 798 ccm |
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Steel | Frame | Steel |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Tubular, Load-bearing engine | Frame type | Tubular, Load-bearing engine |
Brakes Front
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Double piston |
---|---|---|---|---|
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Single piston | Piston | Single piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 100 mm | Front tyre width | 90 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 80 % | Front tyre height | 90 % |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 140 mm | Rear tyre width | 150 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 80 % | Rear tyre height | 70 % |
Length | Length | 2,280 mm | Length | 2,320 mm |
Width | Width | 890 mm | Width | 890 mm |
Height | Height | 1,240 mm | Height | 1,350 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,575 mm | Wheelbase | 1,578 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 790 mm | Seat Height | 880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 16 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 16 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW F 650 GS 2012

When it comes to optional extras, accessories and driver equipment, BMW is the benchmark for us. The driver can have his vehicle configured exactly to his wishes and also order the matching clothing at the same time.
Manoeuvrability
agility
low seat height can be reduced again
heated grips
comfortable seat
resale value.
Wind protection somewhat suboptimal compared to the F800.
BMW F 800 GS 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW F 650 GS vs BMW F 800 GS
Price BMW F 650 GS
Model year
Current average market prices
Price BMW F 800 GS
Model year
Current average market prices