Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 vs. Kawasaki Z900 2021

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Loading...

Overview - Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 vs Kawasaki Z900 2021

The Suzuki GSX-S950 and Kawasaki Z900 are both naked bikes in the 2021 model year, offering powerful performance and advanced features. Let's compare these two motorcycles in terms of their technical specifications, strengths, and weaknesses.

Starting with the technical specifications, both bikes have an inline four-cylinder engine with fuel injection and liquid cooling. The Suzuki GSX-S950 has a slightly lower engine power of 95 HP compared to the Kawasaki Z900's 125.4 HP. However, the Suzuki GSX-S950 compensates with a torque of 92 Nm, which is close to the Z900's 98.6 Nm. Both bikes have a displacement of around 1000ccm and a four-cylinder configuration.

In terms of suspension, both bikes feature upside-down telescopic forks at the front and a swing arm with a monoshock at the rear. The Suzuki GSX-S950 has an aluminum frame with a twin-tube design, while the Kawasaki Z900 has a steel frame with a double cradle design. This difference in frame material may affect the overall weight and handling characteristics of the bikes.

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

When it comes to braking, both bikes are equipped with double disc brakes at the front with four-piston calipers. The Suzuki GSX-S950 has slightly larger front brake discs with a diameter of 310 mm compared to the Z900's 300 mm. The Z900, on the other hand, features petal technology for its front brakes, which may provide improved heat dissipation.

In terms of rider assistance systems, both bikes come with ABS, ride by wire, and traction control. However, the Kawasaki Z900 offers additional features such as riding modes, which may enhance the overall riding experience.

In terms of dimensions and weights, the Suzuki GSX-S950 has a slightly wider rear tire (190 mm) compared to the Z900's 180 mm. The Suzuki also has a slightly longer wheelbase (1460 mm) compared to the Z900's 1450 mm. The seat height of the GSX-S950 is 810 mm, while the Z900 has a slightly lower seat height of 795 mm. The kerb weight of the GSX-S950 is 214 kg, slightly heavier than the Z900's 210 kg.

Both bikes come equipped with LED daytime running lights and LED headlights, providing improved visibility. The Kawasaki Z900 also offers a TFT display, which may provide more advanced and customizable information to the rider.

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Now let's discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each bike. The Suzuki GSX-S950 has a powerful engine with plenty of punch from below and a good sound. It also offers stable brakes and a comfortable seating position. However, it has a chassis that is considered too soft and not adjustable, which may affect the overall handling. Additionally, the cockpit may be difficult to read in direct sunlight.

On the other hand, the Kawasaki Z900 boasts a powerful four-cylinder engine and intuitive handling. It also offers good equipment and has aggressive looks. The Z900 is considered to provide value for money. However, it lacks a quickshifter option, which may be a disadvantage for some riders. Additionally, competitors in the market offer bikes with a 6-axis IMU, which provides more advanced electronic features.

In conclusion, both the Suzuki GSX-S950 and Kawasaki Z900 are powerful naked bikes with their own strengths and weaknesses. The Suzuki offers a comfortable riding position and stable brakes, while the Kawasaki provides intuitive handling and good equipment. Ultimately, the choice between these two bikes will depend on the rider's preferences and priorities.

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 compared to Kawasaki Z900 2021

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021
Kawasaki Z900 2021
Show all
Same only
Differences
Suzuki GSX-S950 2021
Suzuki GSX-S950 2021
Kawasaki Z900 2021
Kawasaki Z900 2021

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore73.4 mmBore73.4 mm
StrokeStroke59 mmStroke56 mm
Engine powerEngine power95 HPEngine power125.4 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,800 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque92 NmTorque98.6 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,700 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.2 Compression Ratio11.8
Fuel systemFuel systemInjectionFuel systemInjection
Throttle BoreThrottle Bore44 mmThrottle Bore36 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeGearshiftTransmission TypeGearshift
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement948 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter43 mmDiameter41 mm
TravelTravel120 mmTravel120 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock
Shock mountShock mountDeflectionShock mountDeflection
TravelTravel130 mmTravel140 mm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeDouble cradle
RakeRake65 degreeRake65 degree
TrailTrail100 mmTrail105 mm

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk
DiameterDiameter310 mmDiameter300 mm
PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
TechnologyTechnologyradialTechnologyPetal

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
DiameterDiameter250 mmDiameter250 mm
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Ride by Wire, Traction controlAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS, Riding modes, Ride by Wire, Traction control

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height50 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,115 mmLength2,070 mm
WidthWidth810 mmWidth820 mm
HeightHeight1,080 mmHeight1,065 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height795 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)214 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)210 kg
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Equipment

EquipmentEquipmentLED daytime running lights, LED-HeadlightsEquipmentLED daytime running lights, LED-Headlights, TFT display

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

Suzuki GSX-S950 2021

The "small" GSX-S950 is damn close to the GSX-S1000, which is why it seems as if the proud surcharge for the 1000 will have to be properly justified. However, anyone who wants it to be as sporty as on the GSX-S1000 will already fail due to the somewhat too soft, non-adjustable suspension. However, this more comfortable design of the 950 fits the character of the engine very well. With (only) 95 hp, the engine, which is identical to the GSX-S1000, is designed for torque from below and in the middle; there is little point in stubbornly wriggling out. So if you are looking for a comparatively comfortable naked bike that is suitable for A2 and that can hardly be distinguished visually from the top model, you can save a lot of money!

Engine with plenty of punch from below

good sound

stable brakes

comfortable seating position

Chassis too soft and not adjustable

cockpit not easy to read in sunlight

Kawasaki Z900 2021

Kawasaki Z900 2021

In terms of price-performance, the Kawasaki Z900 is hard to beat at the moment. With the perfectly tuned engine, the high-quality chassis components and the electronics added for 2020, this naked bike offers everything that sporty riders will be looking for. There is really nothing to complain about, except for the lack of a quickshifter option.

powerful four-cylinder

intuitive handling

good equipment

aggressive looks

value for money

No quickshifter option

competitors with 6-axis IMU electronically ahead.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-S950 vs Kawasaki Z900

There are a few key differences between a Suzuki GSX-S950 2021 and a Kawasaki Z900 2021. It takes less time to sell a Kawasaki Z900 with 107 days compared to 298 days for the Suzuki GSX-S950. Since model year 2021 1000PS.de editors have written 10 reviews for the Suzuki GSX-S950 and 46 reviews for the Kawasaki Z900 since model year 2017. The first review for the Suzuki GSX-S950 was published on 16/06/2021 and now has more than 37,200 views. This compares to more than 93,200 views for the first review on Kawasaki Z900 published on 11/11/2016.

Price Suzuki GSX-S950

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z900

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISSchuberthContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH