Beta RR 350 4T 2020 vs. KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Beta RR 350 4T 2020

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Overview - Beta RR 350 4T 2020 vs KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Beta RR 350 4T 2020

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Technical Specifications Beta RR 350 4T 2020 compared to KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Beta RR 350 4T 2020

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Beta RR 350 4T 2020

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	88 mm	Bore	88 mm
Stroke	Stroke	57.4 mm	Stroke	57.5 mm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	13.19	Compression Ratio	12.3
Starter	Starter	Electric	Starter	Electric, Kick
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	1
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	349.1 ccm	Displacement	349.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Steel	Frame	Steel
Frame type	Frame type	Double cradle	Frame type	Central tube

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	90 mm	Front tyre width	90 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	90 %	Front tyre height	90 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	21 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	140 mm	Rear tyre width	140 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	80 %	Rear tyre height	80 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,490 mm	Wheelbase	1,482 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	940 mm	Seat Height	970 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	107.5 kg	Dry Weight	107.2 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	9 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	9 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Beta RR 350 4T 2020

The all-round machine - copes well with almost any situation. Considerable torque from idle, enough to climb any mountain. The choice for a versatile range of applications.

Quiet good-natured engine

solid construction

Higher total weight compared to a 2-stroke

somewhat more sluggish than the 2-stroke

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

The box-office hit of recent years has been improved with pinpoint accuracy. The usable rev range has been widened, making the 350 a little easier to ride than before. But it still feels like the most radical machine among the 4-stroke models. It combines the advantages of the "250" and "450" but also their disadvantages. Nevertheless: 90% of all KTM customers will set the fastest time on the special test with the 350 EXC-F. It is the most universal purchase recommendation for enduro racers.

Powerful, agile, fast - a real racing machine

The advantages of the four-stroke (engine response, dosing, consumption,...) combined with lightness and sufficient power.

More radical than the 250 and a bit more nervous than the 450. Requires more concentration but also offers more speed

pull-through has improved, but still not so perfect that you don't sometimes wish you had a 450.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta RR 350 4T vs KTM 350 EXC-F

Price Beta RR 350 4T

Model year

Average market price

Current average market prices

Price KTM 350 EXC-F

Model year

Average market price

Current average market prices

Beta RR 350 4T 2020 vs. KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Overview - Beta RR 350 4T 2020 vs KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Technical Specifications Beta RR 350 4T 2020 compared to KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Engine and Drive Train

Suspension Front

Chassis

Brakes Rear

Dimensions and Weights

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Beta RR 350 4T 2020

KTM 350 EXC-F 2016

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta RR 350 4T vs KTM 350 EXC-F

Price Beta RR 350 4T

Price KTM 350 EXC-F

1000PS Partner