BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs. BMW G 310 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2022

BMW G 310 R 2022

Loading...

Overview - BMW S 1000 R 2016 vs BMW G 310 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW G 310 R 2022

BMW G 310 R 2022

Technical Specifications BMW S 1000 R 2016 compared to BMW G 310 R 2022

BMW S 1000 R 2016
BMW G 310 R 2022

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore80 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke49.7 mmStroke62.1 mm
Engine powerEngine power160 HPEngine power34 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque112 NmTorque28 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque9,250 rpmRpm at Torque7,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio10.9
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, AntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement999 ccmDisplacement313 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
DiameterDiameter46 mmDiameter41 mm

Suspension Rear

SuspensionSuspensionSwing armSuspensionSwing arm
Shock absorberShock absorberMonoshockShock absorberMonoshock

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTubular

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsDynamic suspensionAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABS

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height60 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,057 mmLength2,005 mm
WidthWidth845 mmWidth849 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,439 mmWheelbase1,374 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height814 mmSeat Height785 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)207 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)158.5 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17.5 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

BMW S 1000 R 2016

BMW S 1000 R 2016

With the BMW S 1000 R, you notice both the close relationship to the S 1000 RR superbike and the endeavour to equip the machine with a high degree of comfort for country roads and everyday use. Accordingly, the 1000cc four-cylinder power unit is brute and yet easily controllable, and the seating position is correspondingly sporty and comfortable. The fact that the S 1000 R is one of the most affordable power naked bikes is surprising and very pleasing, although one must not get hold of the list of optional extras - because thanks to the many irresistible features, it will certainly be more expensive.

Powerful and well controllable engine

powerful braking system

comfortable seating position

irresistible but expensive optional extras

hard chassis

BMW G 310 R 2022

BMW G 310 R 2022

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW S 1000 R vs BMW G 310 R

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW G 310 R

Model year
Current average market prices