Motowell Magnet RS 2010 vs. Piaggio Zip 50 4T 2017

Motowell Magnet RS 2010

Motowell Magnet RS 2010

Piaggio Zip 50 4T 2017

Piaggio Zip 50 4T 2017

Loading...

Overview - Motowell Magnet RS 2010 vs Piaggio Zip 50 4T 2017

Motowell Magnet RS 2010

Motowell Magnet RS 2010

Piaggio Zip 50 4T 2017

Piaggio Zip 50 4T 2017

Technical Specifications Motowell Magnet RS 2010 compared to Piaggio Zip 50 4T 2017

Motowell Magnet RS 2010
Piaggio Zip 50 4T 2017

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power5.3 HPEngine power4.5 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power7,900 rpmRpm at Max. Power8,700 rpm
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
Transmission TypeTransmission TypeAutomaticTransmission TypeAutomatic
DisplacementDisplacement49.3 ccmDisplacement49 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDrumTypeDrum

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width130 mmFront tyre width100 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter13 inchFront tyre diameter10 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width130 mmRear tyre width120 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter13 inchRear tyre diameter10 inch
LengthLength1,800 mmLength1,700 mm
WidthWidth700 mmWidth680 mm
HeightHeight1,100 mmHeight1,060 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,270 mmWheelbase1,200 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity5.5 lFuel Tank Capacity7.3 l
Top SpeedTop Speed45 km/hTop Speed45 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyAMLicense compliancyAM

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Motowell Magnet RS vs Piaggio Zip 50 4T

Price Motowell Magnet RS

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Piaggio Zip 50 4T

Model year
Current average market prices

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH