Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2016

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Overview - Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2016 vs Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2016

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Technical Specifications Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2016 compared to Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2016

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2016

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	102 mm	Bore	71 mm
Stroke	Stroke	84.5 mm	Stroke	50.9 mm
Engine power	Engine power	67 HP	Engine power	113 HP
Rpm at Max. Power	Rpm at Max. Power	7,500 rpm	Rpm at Max. Power	10,200 rpm
Torque	Torque	68 Nm	Torque	83 Nm
Rpm at Torque	Rpm at Torque	6,000 rpm	Rpm at Torque	8,000 rpm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	12.6	Compression Ratio	11.9
Clutch Type	Clutch Type	Antihopping	Clutch Type	Multiplate in oil-bath
Transmission	Transmission	Chain	Transmission	Chain
Cylinders	Cylinders	1	Cylinders	4
Strokes	Strokes	4-Stroke	Strokes	4-Stroke
Cooling	Cooling	liquid	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	690 ccm	Displacement	806 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspension	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork	Front suspension	Upside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame	Frame	Chromium-molybdenum	Frame	Steel
Frame type	Frame type	Tubular	Frame type	Double cradle

Brakes Front

Type	Type	Single disk	Type	Double disk
Piston	Piston	Four pistons	Piston	Four pistons
Shock mount	Shock mount	Fixed caliper	Shock mount	Fixed caliper
Technology	Technology	radial	Technology	Petal

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc
Piston	Piston	Single piston	Piston	Single piston
Shock mount	Shock mount	Floating caliper	Shock mount	Floating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	21 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	18 inch	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,504 mm	Wheelbase	1,445 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	910 mm	Seat Height	834 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	13 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	17 l
License compliancy	License compliancy	A	License compliancy	A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Overall, the Z800 delivered a sensational performance. Considering the fact that nothing was changed or optimised on the vehicle apart from the Remus rear silencer, a super final result.

Eye-catching, chunky look

confident acceleration

relaxed geometry

powerful brakes

Limited freedom of movement for the legs.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna 701 Enduro vs Kawasaki Z 800

Price Husqvarna 701 Enduro

Model year

Average market price

Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki Z 800

Model year

Average market price

Current average market prices

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2016 vs. Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Overview - Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2016 vs Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Technical Specifications Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2016 compared to Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Engine and Drive Train

Suspension Front

Chassis

Brakes Front

Brakes Rear

Dimensions and Weights

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna 701 Enduro 2016

Kawasaki Z 800 2013

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna 701 Enduro vs Kawasaki Z 800

Price Husqvarna 701 Enduro

Price Kawasaki Z 800

1000PS Partner