Kawasaki Z 800 2016 vs. Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Kawasaki Z 800 2016

Kawasaki Z 800 2016

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki Z 800 2016 compared to Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Kawasaki Z 800 2016
Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore71 mmBore97 mm
StrokeStroke50.9 mmStroke67.8 mm
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement806 ccmDisplacement510 ccm

Brakes Front

TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyWave

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,445 mmWheelbase1,495 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height834 mmSeat Height963 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity7.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki Z 800 2016

Kawasaki Z 800 2016

Overall, the Z800 delivered a sensational performance. Considering the fact that nothing was changed or optimised on the vehicle apart from the Remus rear silencer, a super final result.

Eye-catching, chunky look

confident acceleration

relaxed geometry

powerful brakes

Limited freedom of movement for the legs.

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Husqvarna TE 510 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki Z 800 vs Husqvarna TE 510

Price Kawasaki Z 800

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Husqvarna TE 510

Model year
Current average market prices