KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2018 vs. Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2018

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2018

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Loading...

Overview - KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2018 vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2018

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2018

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Technical Specifications KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2018 compared to Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2018
Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore108 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke71 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power177 HPEngine power132 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,870 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpm
TorqueTorque144 NmTorque110 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque6,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.2 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeAntihoppingClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders3
DisplacementDisplacement1,301 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandShowa

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandShowa

Chassis

FrameFrameChromium-molybdenumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTubularFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyradial, MonoblockTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston
Shock mountShock mountFixed caliperShock mountFloating caliper
BrandBrandBremboBrandNissin

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width190 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,482 mmWheelbase1,437 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height835 mmSeat Height828 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity18 lFuel Tank Capacity17.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2018

KTM 1290 Super Duke R 2018

The epithet "Beast" is not completely out of the blue, the KTM is and remains a brutal naked bike - 177 hp from two pots with a combined displacement of 1301 cubic metres is nothing harmless. Nevertheless, it is surprisingly easy to control; the upright seating position combined with the good handling make it seem almost docile. Compared to its predecessor, it has been improved precisely at its weakest points. The engine now runs more smoothly, the shift assistant brings calmness in the acceleration phase and the chassis has been improved in quality. But it still loves the wild chase more than high speed in long curves.

Provides a wonderful adrenaline rush

extensive configuration options

terrific brakes with cornering ABS

practical electronic features

great seating position

electronic features can be set very sporty and also deactivated

very good shift assistant

Precise stroke not always easy to hit

one of the most dangerous motorbikes for the driving licence on the market

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Triumph Speed Triple 1050 2011

Even a Super Duke is in a tight spot when the bends are not too sharp and the KTM can make full use of its radical handling and its unrivalled ability to correct the radius on naked bikes. The Speed Triple is more harmonious, patient and predictable. The Duke has to be beaten, the Triple can also be stroked.

Controlled chassis

hard sound

stable.

Rough gearing sometimes disturbs the idyll between man and machine.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R vs Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Price KTM 1290 Super Duke R

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Speed Triple 1050

Model year
Current average market prices