SWM RS 500 R 2016 vs. Husqvarna TE 450 2005

SWM RS 500 R 2016

SWM RS 500 R 2016

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Loading...

Technical Specifications SWM RS 500 R 2016 compared to Husqvarna TE 450 2005

SWM RS 500 R 2016
Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Engine and Drive Train

TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement501 ccmDisplacement449 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,460 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height975 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight112 kgDry Weight116 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity9 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

SWM RS 500 R 2016

SWM RS 500 R 2016

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Husqvarna TE 450 2005

Very powerful engine and good performance in the MX special stage. Clean straight-line running in deep soil. Swedish steel is back! The Husky brings even heavier kilos wonderfully smoothly through the worst mud pits and up the steep slope without any problems.

Positive handling

low price

stability

decent performance

robust.

Agility

complicated handling - requires strength.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price SWM RS 500 R vs Husqvarna TE 450

Price SWM RS 500 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TE 450

Model year
Current average market prices