Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013 vs. Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013

Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Loading...

Technical Specifications Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013 compared to Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013
Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore84 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke90 mmStroke67.8 mm
Engine powerEngine power28 HPEngine power47 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power5,250 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,100 rpm
TorqueTorque41 NmTorque52 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque4,000 rpmRpm at Torque4,000 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio8.5 Compression Ratio9.5
StarterStarterElectric, KickStarterElectric, Kick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears5Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesOHVValvesOHV
CoolingCoolingAirCoolingOil-air
DisplacementDisplacement499 ccmDisplacement648 ccm

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeLoad-bearing engineFrame typeLoad-bearing engine

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDrumTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width100 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter18 inchFront tyre diameter18 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width110 mmRear tyre width130 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height80 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
LengthLength2,160 mmLength2,122 mm
WidthWidth800 mmWidth744 mm
HeightHeight1,050 mmHeight1,024 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,370 mmWheelbase1,400 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight175 kgDry Weight198 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15 lFuel Tank Capacity12.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyA2License compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013

Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome 2013

Creeping through open country at 70 and not just perceiving the surroundings as a blurred line, but enjoying the beauty of it. Or chugging along next to a concrete wall and perceiving the sound reflections of the long-stroke single cylinder under your helmet - that's real driving fun.

True driving pleasure

classic cars - unique, rare

Low performance

Unsteady at high speeds

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 2018

Visually, the new Royal Enfield Continental GT 650 is closely related to its single-cylinder sister Continental GT 535, but technically it takes a huge step forward. The parallel twin-cylinder engine with 48 hp and 53 Newton metres of torque is lively and refined, the handling is surprisingly stable and the brakes are also convincing. Electronic features are in vain, but the wonderful cafe racer look remains absolutely authentic. The price should also be set so low in Europe that Royal Enfield should no longer be a quirky exotic.

Agile and refined powerplant

cool two-cylinder sound

comfortable seating position

stable handling

good brakes

wonderful old school look

reasonable price

classic round instruments.

ABS not quite sensitive, no electronic features - in case anyone needs them...

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome vs Royal Enfield Continental GT 650

Price Royal Enfield Bullet 500 Classic Chrome

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Royal Enfield Continental GT 650

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH