Yamaha MT-09 2016 vs. Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Loading...

Overview - Yamaha MT-09 2016 vs Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Technical Specifications Yamaha MT-09 2016 compared to Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Yamaha MT-09 2016
Triumph Sprint ST 2010
Show all
Same only
Differences
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Yamaha MT-09 2016
Triumph Sprint ST 2010
Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore78 mmBore79 mm
StrokeStroke59.1 mmStroke71.4 mm
Engine powerEngine power115 HPEngine power126 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power10,000 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,250 rpm
TorqueTorque87.5 NmTorque105 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque8,500 rpmRpm at Torque7,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.5 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders3
Valves per cylinderValves per cylinder4Valves per cylinder4
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC
DisplacementDisplacement847 ccmDisplacement1,050 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionTelescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width180 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,075 mmLength2,114 mm
WidthWidth815 mmWidth750 mm
HeightHeight1,135 mmHeight1,215 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,440 mmWheelbase1,457 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height815 mmSeat Height805 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity14 lFuel Tank Capacity20 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Yamaha MT-09 2016

Yamaha MT-09 2016

The Yamaha MT-09 did not need to be reinvented for the coming season - it already was extremely well done almost four years ago. Instead, the Japanese focus on fine-tuning and adding practical, contemporary gimmicks such as traction control and automatic shifting. Due to the Euro4 standard, however, the engine management has been changed once again and offers an emphatically powerful but well controllable power delivery in standard mode; the power explosion of the first generation is now no longer offered even by the sharper A mode. The biggest change, recognisable at first glance, is the, in my opinion, extremely successful design with the more aggressive front and the newly designed rear. All in all, an even snazzier naked bike that was clearly built for the fun of motorcycling.

Wonderfully powerful three-cylinder powerplant

three power modes

fully adjustable chassis

quickshifter as standard

sporty upright seating position

good brakes

aggressive looks

traction control.

Saddle a little too hard for long tours

licence plate holder on the swingarm offers less splash protection than a conventional one

Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Triumph Sprint ST 2010

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Yamaha MT-09 vs Triumph Sprint ST

Price Yamaha MT-09

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Triumph Sprint ST

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

LOUISContinental MotorradreifenSchuberthcalimoto GmbHMotorex AG