Suzuki GSX-R 750 2009 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2023

Suzuki GSX-R 750 2009

Suzuki GSX-R 750 2009

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

Loading...

Technical Specifications Suzuki GSX-R 750 2009 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2023

Suzuki GSX-R 750 2009
BMW S 1000 R 2023

Engine and Drive Train

Engine typeEngine typeIn lineEngine typeIn line
BoreBore70 mmBore80 mm
StrokeStroke48.7 mmStroke49.7 mm
Engine powerEngine power110.3 HPEngine power165 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power13,200 rpmRpm at Max. Power11,000 rpm
TorqueTorque86.3 NmTorque114 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque11,200 rpmRpm at Torque9,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.5 Compression Ratio12.5
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders4Cylinders4
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
ValvesValvesDOHCValvesDOHC, Drag lever
DisplacementDisplacement749 ccmDisplacement999 ccm

Suspension Front

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Suspension Rear

AdjustmentAdjustmentCompression, Preload, ReboundAdjustmentCompression, Preload, Rebound

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin-SparFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeDouble disk

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width120 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width180 mmRear tyre width190 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height55 %Rear tyre height55 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,040 mmLength2,090 mm
WidthWidth715 mmWidth812 mm
HeightHeight1,125 mmHeight1,115 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,400 mmWheelbase1,450 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height810 mmSeat Height830 mm
Kerb WeightKerb Weight198 kgKerb Weight199 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity17 lFuel Tank Capacity16.5 l
Top SpeedTop Speed280 km/hTop Speed200 km/h
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Suzuki GSX-R 750 2009

Suzuki GSX-R 750 2009

The GSX-R 750 is the golden mean in many respects. It offers a level of power that is not overwhelming on the road but is also a lot of fun. On the one hand, it is relatively inexpensive, but on the other, it is still fast enough. The GSX-R 750 is a great supersport machine. If you don't value superlatives and just want a good bike, go for the GSX-R 750 and use the money you save to treat yourself to race training sessions on the Nordschleife....

Excellent engine reponsiveness

great modulation

comfortable riding position even for tall riders

reliable technology

perfect transmission

unspectacular at the pub-talk

brake pads and lines too slack for racetrack use

long final drive ratio

BMW S 1000 R 2023

BMW S 1000 R 2023

The seating position is sporty, but by no means uncomfortable, the brakes are powerful and the engine of the S 1000 R is at its best - perhaps even a little too homogeneous. There is also nothing to complain about on the riding side. Based on the pure performance data and the installed electronic features, the BMW probably has what it takes for the fastest lap time. And that on any kind of surface, because with the semi-active suspension you can eat up kilometre after kilometre on bad roads littered with potholes. Unfortunately, this feeling of superiority never really spilled over to the driver. Probably the downside of too much balance in all areas - at least in my Italophile eyes. The BMW lacked that certain something, the charisma, which is difficult to explain but arouses genuine emotions.

powerful engine

strong brakes

comfortable ergonomics

good standard equipment

extensive range of accessories

Sluggish shift assistant

optics not 100% coherent

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Suzuki GSX-R 750 vs BMW S 1000 R

Price Suzuki GSX-R 750

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW S 1000 R

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons