TM SMR 125 2013 vs. Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

TM SMR 125 2013

TM SMR 125 2013

Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

Loading...

Overview - TM SMR 125 2013 vs Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

TM SMR 125 2013

TM SMR 125 2013

Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

Technical Specifications TM SMR 125 2013 compared to Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

TM SMR 125 2013
Beta Evo 125 2T 2017

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke54 mm
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement124 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typePerimeterFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width110 mmFront tyre width80 mm
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width110 mm
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8.2 lFuel Tank Capacity2.6 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price TM SMR 125 vs Beta Evo 125 2T

Price TM SMR 125

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Beta Evo 125 2T

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH