Kawasaki KLX 110 2009 vs. Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Kawasaki KLX 110 2009

Kawasaki KLX 110 2009

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Loading...

Overview - Kawasaki KLX 110 2009 vs Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Kawasaki KLX 110 2009

Kawasaki KLX 110 2009

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Technical Specifications Kawasaki KLX 110 2009 compared to Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Kawasaki KLX 110 2009
Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore53 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke50.6 mmStroke54.5 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeCentrifugal forceClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement111 ccmDisplacement124.8 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDrumTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter14 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter12 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,065 mmWheelbase1,471 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height650 mmSeat Height960 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity3.8 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki KLX 110 2009

Kawasaki KLX 110 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

Husqvarna TE 125 2016

The beginner enduro for riders who want to do everything right from the start. Does not forgive shifting errors and always wants to be ridden in the right rev range. In 2017, the 125 was made even lighter - dry, the 125 weighs just 92 kg.

cheapest model

easy handling

best learning effect

Less forgiving of mistakes

limited engine power

Alternative Comparisons