Ducati Monster 696 2011 vs. KTM 690 Duke 2012

Ducati Monster 696 2011

KTM 690 Duke 2012

Overview - Ducati Monster 696 2011 vs KTM 690 Duke 2012

Ducati Monster 696 2011

KTM 690 Duke 2012

CLICK BAG. The one with the “click”.

The Wunderlich tank bag with smart handling.

Details

50 Years Strong: One Brand – One Promise!

Perfect fit, premium quality – with Hepco&Becker accessories, your bike is ready for any adventure. Quality made in Germany.

Details

Technical Specifications Ducati Monster 696 2011 compared to KTM 690 Duke 2012

Ducati Monster 696 2011

KTM 690 Duke 2012

Ducati Monster 696 2011

KTM 690 Duke 2012

Engine and Drive Train

Bore	Bore	88 mm	Bore	102 mm
Stroke	Stroke	57.2 mm	Stroke	84.5 mm
Engine power	Engine power	80 HP	Engine power	70 HP
Rpm at Max. Power	Rpm at Max. Power	9,000 rpm	Rpm at Max. Power	7,500 rpm
Torque	Torque	69 Nm	Torque	70 Nm
Rpm at Torque	Rpm at Torque	7,750 rpm	Rpm at Torque	5,500 rpm
Compression Ratio	Compression Ratio	10.7	Compression Ratio	12.6
Cylinders	Cylinders	2	Cylinders	1
Valves	Valves	Desmodromic	Valves	Rocker arm, OHC
Cooling	Cooling	Air	Cooling	liquid
Displacement	Displacement	696 ccm	Displacement	690 ccm

Suspension Front

Brand	Brand	Sachs	Brand	WP

Suspension Rear

Brand	Brand	Sachs	Brand	WP

Brakes Rear

Type	Type	Disc	Type	Disc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre width	Front tyre width	120 mm	Front tyre width	120 mm
Front tyre height	Front tyre height	60 %	Front tyre height	70 %
Front tyre diameter	Front tyre diameter	17 inch	Front tyre diameter	17 inch
Rear tyre width	Rear tyre width	160 mm	Rear tyre width	160 mm
Rear tyre height	Rear tyre height	60 %	Rear tyre height	60 %
Rear tyre diameter	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch	Rear tyre diameter	17 inch
Wheelbase	Wheelbase	1,450 mm	Wheelbase	1,466 mm
Seat Height	Seat Height	770 mm	Seat Height	835 mm
Dry Weight	Dry Weight	161 kg	Dry Weight	149.5 kg
Fuel Tank Capacity	Fuel Tank Capacity	15 l	Fuel Tank Capacity	14 l
License compliancy	License compliancy	A	License compliancy	A

Pros and Cons in comparison

Ducati Monster 696 2011

Touring riders, those who like to travel and synchronised riders will not enjoy it due to the lack of mounting options for luggage systems and limited space on the pillion. But modern city dwellers, nimble country dwellers and hard-working weekend sportsmen will find the 696 the lubricant for the purpose - and at a relatively reasonable price.

Low but relaxed seat height

fairly low overall weight

robust

agile

fun to ride

good braking system.

Sometimes difficult to handle

poorly readable digital instruments.

KTM 690 Duke 2012

More than a decade after its launch, the KTM 690 Duke remains a fascinating bike with its own character. The attempt to turn the rebellious Duke into a bike with more mass appeal has proven to be a successful strategy. The combination of an outstanding LC4 engine, direct handling and good value for money continues to make it an attractive option for riders looking for something special. Although newer twin-cylinder models are superior in terms of smooth running and comfort, the 690 Duke offers an immediacy and character that only a large single-cylinder can deliver. As a used motorbike, it has proven to be surprisingly stable in value and durable - provided you pay attention to regular maintenance.

Outstanding LC4 single-cylinder engine with a unique character

Outstanding power-to-weight ratio (2.29 kg/HP)

Direct, precise handling in all riding situations

Good value stability and surprising longevity

Disengageable ABS and effective anti-hopping clutch

Low fuel consumption (3.5-4 litres/100 km)

Suspension without adjustability with limited reserves

Mediocre shifting precision, especially at higher mileages

Alternator as a potential weak point at higher mileages

Clutch play needs to be adjusted more frequently

"Whipping" chain at very low speeds in the partial load range

Slight vibrations at higher speeds (especially before 2016)