Husqvarna FE 501 2024 vs. GASGAS EC 300 2009

Husqvarna FE 501 2024

Husqvarna FE 501 2024

GASGAS EC 300 2009

GASGAS EC 300 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna FE 501 2024 compared to GASGAS EC 300 2009

Husqvarna FE 501 2024
GASGAS EC 300 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore95 mmBore72 mm
StrokeStroke72 mmStroke72 mm
StarterStarterElectricStarterKick
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement510.9 ccmDisplacement294.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Chassis

Frame typeFrame typeDouble cradle, Central tubeFrame typeDeltabox

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,487 mmWheelbase1,476 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height952 mmSeat Height945 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight110.8 kgDry Weight102 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna FE 501 2024

Husqvarna FE 501 2024

Overpowered? Yes, of course! But in the saddle, this also has its advantages. In many situations, you can save yourself over difficult obstacles even with the wrong gear. The 501 can cope with the lowest revs and chugs ponderously along the track when tired. Sporty pilots will probably avoid the FE 501. They will achieve better lap times with the 350 or the 2-strokes. However, the 501 is a good choice for experienced pilots who also like to ride long passages without racing stress.

Practical chassis setup for a wide range of uses

Precise lines

Low vibration level in the saddle

Robust overall appearance

Very practical details

Low weight

Great ergonomics in the saddle

Plenty of room to move on the bike

High-quality chassis

Well-tuned engine makes use of the enormous potential

Strong traction

Very pleasant and thoroughly relaxed to ride over long distances

Very great performance on steep slopes - good traction, surprisingly low wheelie tendency.

Plastics in the boot area quickly look very worn

Prices are normally always a matter of opinion - in this case, however, the whole range seems good but expensive

The recessed grip on the seat is too far forward

Stand has to be folded out a bit fiddly

In downhill sections, the motor pushes noticeably harder than the lighter models

GASGAS EC 300 2009

GASGAS EC 300 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna FE 501 vs GASGAS EC 300

Price Husqvarna FE 501

Model year
Current average market prices

Price GASGAS EC 300

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH