BMW K 1300 R 2013 vs. BMW S 1000 R 2014

BMW K 1300 R 2013

BMW S 1000 R 2014
Loading...
Technical Specifications BMW K 1300 R 2013 compared to BMW S 1000 R 2014
BMW K 1300 R 2013
BMW S 1000 R 2014
Engine and Drive Train
Engine type | Engine type | In line | Engine type | In line |
---|---|---|---|---|
Bore | Bore | 80 mm | Bore | 80 mm |
Stroke | Stroke | 64.3 mm | Stroke | 49.7 mm |
Engine power | Engine power | 172 HP | Engine power | 160 HP |
Rpm at Max. Power | Rpm at Max. Power | 9,250 rpm | Rpm at Max. Power | 11,000 rpm |
Torque | Torque | 140 Nm | Torque | 112 Nm |
Rpm at Torque | Rpm at Torque | 8,250 rpm | Rpm at Torque | 9,250 rpm |
Compression Ratio | Compression Ratio | 13 | Compression Ratio | 12 |
Clutch Type | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath | Clutch Type | Multiplate in oil-bath, Antihopping |
Transmission | Transmission | Prop shaft | Transmission | Chain |
Number of gears | Number of gears | 6 | Number of gears | 6 |
Cylinders | Cylinders | 4 | Cylinders | 4 |
Strokes | Strokes | 4-Stroke | Strokes | 4-Stroke |
Displacement | Displacement | 1,293 ccm | Displacement | 999 ccm |
Suspension Front
Front suspension | Front suspension | Strut | Front suspension | Upside-Down telescopic fork |
---|
Suspension Rear
Suspension | Suspension | Single swing arm | Suspension | Swing arm |
---|
Chassis
Frame | Frame | Aluminium | Frame | Aluminium |
---|---|---|---|---|
Frame type | Frame type | Twin Tube, Load-bearing engine | Frame type | Twin Tube |
Brakes Front
Type | Type | Double disk | Type | Double disk |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Four pistons | Piston | Four pistons |
Brakes Rear
Type | Type | Disc | Type | Disc |
---|---|---|---|---|
Piston | Piston | Double piston | Piston | Single piston |
Shock mount | Shock mount | Floating caliper | Shock mount | Floating caliper |
Dimensions and Weights
Front tyre width | Front tyre width | 120 mm | Front tyre width | 120 mm |
---|---|---|---|---|
Front tyre height | Front tyre height | 70 % | Front tyre height | 70 % |
Front tyre diameter | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch | Front tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Rear tyre width | Rear tyre width | 180 mm | Rear tyre width | 190 mm |
Rear tyre height | Rear tyre height | 55 % | Rear tyre height | 55 % |
Rear tyre diameter | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch | Rear tyre diameter | 17 inch |
Length | Length | 2,228 mm | Length | 2,057 mm |
Width | Width | 856 mm | Width | 845 mm |
Wheelbase | Wheelbase | 1,585 mm | Wheelbase | 1,439 mm |
Seat Height | Seat Height | 820 mm | Seat Height | 814 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 l | Fuel Tank Capacity | 17.5 l |
License compliancy | License compliancy | A | License compliancy | A |
Pros and Cons in comparison
Pros and Cons in comparison
BMW K 1300 R 2013

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.
BMW S 1000 R 2014

Brutal power, smooth, almost perfect, electronics, it only gets better with the HP4. Now BMW dominates the 1000cc naked bike class after the superbikes.
Sporty chassis
extreme power and performance
very good electronic helpers
terrific price/performance ratio
fast and comfortable on the racetrack and on country roads.
Slightly rough engine running
DDC works well, but still rather on the "hard" side overall
seat relatively high
tempts to overdrive
design a matter of taste.
Price Comparison Avarage Market Price BMW K 1300 R vs BMW S 1000 R
Price BMW K 1300 R
Model year
Current average market prices
Price BMW S 1000 R
Model year
Current average market prices