Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 vs. KTM 390 Duke 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 compared to KTM 390 Duke 2016

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
KTM 390 Duke 2016
Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
KTM 390 Duke 2016
KTM 390 Duke 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore89 mm
StrokeStroke60 mmStroke60 mm
Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power44 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power8,500 rpmRpm at Max. Power9,500 rpm
TorqueTorque66 NmTorque35 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,000 rpmRpm at Torque7,250 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11.3 Compression Ratio12.6
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement373.2 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameChromium-molybdenum

Brakes Front

TypeTypeDouble diskTypeSingle disk
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonFour pistons
Shock mountShock mountSemi-SchwimmsattelShock mountFixed caliper
TechnologyTechnologyPetalTechnologyradial

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height70 %
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width160 mmRear tyre width150 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height60 %
WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,367 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height800 mm
Kerb Weight (with ABS)Kerb Weight (with ABS)208 kgKerb Weight (with ABS)139 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA2

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

You won't find such a coherent package with such fine details anywhere else at this price. The ER-6n has become a little sharper again, both visually and dynamically, and is more fun than ever.

ABS

wider handlebars

slimmer waist

increased intake noise

comfortable seat

uncomplicated chassis.

None

KTM 390 Duke 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2016

The KTM 390 Duke is a really good compromise between sportiness, reason, riding comfort, fun and price. Best of all: it doesn't feel like a compromise at all, but like it's ready to race.

Low weight

sufficient power

high fun factor

low consumption

Sluggish clutch

small geometry

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs KTM 390 Duke

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price KTM 390 Duke

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

KTM 690 Duke 2018
VS.
KTM 390 Duke 2018

KTM 690 Duke 2018 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2018

Kawasaki Z 400 2020
VS.
KTM 390 Duke 2020

Kawasaki Z 400 2020 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2020

KTM 200 Duke 2014
VS.
KTM 390 Duke 2020

KTM 200 Duke 2014 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2020

KTM 390 Duke 2020
VS.
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401 2020

KTM 390 Duke 2020 vs
Husqvarna Vitpilen 401 2020

BMW G 310 R 2020
VS.
KTM 390 Duke 2020

BMW G 310 R 2020 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2020

KTM 390 Duke 2021
VS.
Husqvarna Svartpilen 401 2021

KTM 390 Duke 2021 vs
Husqvarna Svartpilen 401 2021

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016
VS.
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

Kawasaki ER-6f 2016 vs
Kawasaki ER-6n 2016

KTM 390 Duke 2021
VS.
Yamaha MT-07 2021

KTM 390 Duke 2021 vs
Yamaha MT-07 2021

Yamaha MT-07 2018
VS.
KTM 390 Duke 2018

Yamaha MT-07 2018 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2018

Kawasaki Z 650 2021
VS.
KTM 390 Duke 2021

Kawasaki Z 650 2021 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2021

KTM 390 Duke 2020
VS.
Honda CB 500 F 2019

KTM 390 Duke 2020 vs
Honda CB 500 F 2019

Sym Wolf SB 250 Ni 2014
VS.
KTM 390 Duke 2020

Sym Wolf SB 250 Ni 2014 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2020

Honda CB300R 2020
VS.
KTM 390 Duke 2020

Honda CB300R 2020 vs
KTM 390 Duke 2020