Beta Evo 300 2T 2011 vs. Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Beta Evo 300 2T 2011

Beta Evo 300 2T 2011

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Loading...

Overview - Beta Evo 300 2T 2011 vs Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Beta Evo 300 2T 2011

Beta Evo 300 2T 2011

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Technical Specifications Beta Evo 300 2T 2011 compared to Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Beta Evo 300 2T 2011
Beta Evo 290 2T 2011

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore84 mmBore78 mm
StrokeStroke53.6 mmStroke60.5 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio11 Compression Ratio9.5
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement297.6 ccmDisplacement289.1 ccm

Chassis

FrameFrameAluminiumFrameAluminium
Frame typeFrame typeTwin TubeFrame typeTwin Tube

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonFour pistons

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonDouble pistonPistonDouble piston

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
LengthLength1,990 mmLength1,990 mm
WidthWidth850 mmWidth850 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,305 mmWheelbase1,305 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height660 mmSeat Height660 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight71.5 kgDry Weight69 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity2.6 lFuel Tank Capacity2.6 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Beta Evo 300 2T vs Beta Evo 290 2T

Price Beta Evo 300 2T

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Beta Evo 290 2T

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH