Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2011 vs. BMW F 700 GS 2016

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2011

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2011

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2011 compared to BMW F 700 GS 2016

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2011
BMW F 700 GS 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore74 mmBore82 mm
StrokeStroke61.9 mmStroke75.6 mm
Engine powerEngine power95 HPEngine power75 HP
Rpm at Max. PowerRpm at Max. Power9,300 rpmRpm at Max. Power7,300 rpm
TorqueTorque79 NmTorque77 Nm
Rpm at TorqueRpm at Torque7,850 rpmRpm at Torque5,500 rpm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio12
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
Number of gearsNumber of gears6Number of gears6
CylindersCylinders3Cylinders2
DisplacementDisplacement799 ccmDisplacement798 ccm

Brakes Front

PistonPistonFour pistonsPistonDouble piston

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc
PistonPistonSingle pistonPistonSingle piston
Shock mountShock mountFloating caliperShock mountFloating caliper

Assistance Systems

Advanced Rider Assistance SystemsAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsABSAdvanced Rider Assistance SystemsSuspension electronically adjustable

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height80 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter19 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height70 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
LengthLength2,215 mmLength2,280 mm
WidthWidth865 mmWidth855 mm
WheelbaseWheelbase1,568 mmWheelbase1,562 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height865 mmSeat Height820 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity19 lFuel Tank Capacity16 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2011

Triumph Tiger 800 XC 2011

I like the Tiger 800 XC not only on the road for my daily commute to work. It is a very uncomplicated vehicle which, thanks to the powerful and lively engine, is not only very useful but also a lot of fun. On the racetrack, I actually only used the vehicle for my instructor work. But I couldn't help it and had to take to the track once in the faster group. The high-quality chassis and the agile engine were a joy to ride and the Tiger 800 XC is THE universal talent par excellence for me.

lively engine

sporty but comfortable chassis

very easy to handle

lots of practical benefits

great price/performance ratio

Spartan dashboards

on-board computer cannot be operated from the end of the handlebar

wind / weather protection not so great

BMW F 700 GS 2016

BMW F 700 GS 2016

The smaller of the two F GS sisters, the F 700 GS convinces with a successful overall performance. It looks like its big sister, but at its core it is more of a lively naked bike than a big enduro. The fact that the bike has outgrown the entry-level segment can be seen in the braking system - with two brake discs at the front, it is on a par with its big 800 sister and now decelerates just as confidently. In terms of the chassis, it convinces with good suspension comfort and at the same time a firm set-up in tight bends. Upgrading is never a problem with BMW; in addition to traction control, there is also the electronic suspension ESA for the F 700 GS.

Very manageable

surprisingly powerful

comfortable seating position

low seat height

good brakes

good price.

any optics

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Triumph Tiger 800 XC vs BMW F 700 GS

Price Triumph Tiger 800 XC

Model year
Current average market prices

Price BMW F 700 GS

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons