Husqvarna TE 250 2010 vs. SWM SM 125 R 2020

Husqvarna TE 250 2010

Husqvarna TE 250 2010

SWM SM 125 R 2020

SWM SM 125 R 2020

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 250 2010 vs SWM SM 125 R 2020

Husqvarna TE 250 2010

Husqvarna TE 250 2010

SWM SM 125 R 2020

SWM SM 125 R 2020

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 250 2010 compared to SWM SM 125 R 2020

Husqvarna TE 250 2010
SWM SM 125 R 2020

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore79 mmBore58 mm
StrokeStroke1,000 mmStroke47.2 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio13.6 Compression Ratio12.8
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement250 ccmDisplacement124.7 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width110 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height70 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height70 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,470 mmWheelbase1,500 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height950 mmSeat Height914 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7 lFuel Tank Capacity8 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 250 vs SWM SM 125 R

Price Husqvarna TE 250

Model year
Current average market prices

Price SWM SM 125 R

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH