Husaberg TE 125 2012 vs. Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 125 2012 compared to Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Husaberg TE 125 2012
Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore54 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke54.5 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
DisplacementDisplacement124.8 ccmDisplacement124 ccm

Suspension Front

BrandBrandWPBrandPaioli

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandPaioli

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter17 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter17 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,470 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height990 mmSeat Height870 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight97 kgDry Weight113 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity9.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

The little one with the somewhat nervous temperament joined the Swedish family only last year. The 125 is certainly not the easiest Husaberg to ride, but if you can master the TE 125, you can master all the others.

Feather-light dry weight

nimble on the move.

Chassis needs getting used to

steep ascents complicated.

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Husqvarna SM 125 2009

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH