Husqvarna SM 610 2009 vs. KTM 625 SMC 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

KTM 625 SMC 2006

KTM 625 SMC 2006

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 610 2009 compared to KTM 625 SMC 2006

Husqvarna SM 610 2009
KTM 625 SMC 2006

Engine and Drive Train

CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement576 ccmDisplacement625 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,485 mmWheelbase1,510 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height910 mmSeat Height910 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight142.5 kgDry Weight146 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity12.5 lFuel Tank Capacity9.2 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

Husqvarna SM 610 2009

The Husky is by no means an inexpensive entry-level bike. However, single-cylinder enthusiasts looking for power, a great chassis and civil service intervals have come to the right place with the Husky. A good iron!

Optimal chassis

independent geometry

linear steering feel

high-quality fork

qualitative workmanship.

Hakelige ignition lock seems to have been reworked cheaply

high price

not suitable for long-distance travel

spare parts supply problematic.

KTM 625 SMC 2006

KTM 625 SMC 2006

For power freaks, the KTM 625SMC is an excellent compromise in road use. The iron marches splendidly, has an e-start, reasonable service intervals and also offers some comfort. In terms of handling and agility, it can't quite keep up with the two lightweights 450 Husky and 650 Berg.

Steel rear

approved for 2 persons

suitable for everyday use

e-starter

high-quality details

comfort.

The already old headlight mask is a bit boring

Nothing for beginners

A bit heavier than racing supermotos

Alternative Comparisons