Husqvarna SM 449 R 2012 vs. Husaberg FE 450 2012

Husqvarna SM 449 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 449 R 2012

Husaberg FE 450 2012

Husaberg FE 450 2012

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husqvarna SM 449 R 2012 compared to Husaberg FE 450 2012

Husqvarna SM 449 R 2012
Husaberg FE 450 2012

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore98 mmBore95 mm
StrokeStroke59.6 mmStroke63.4 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12 Compression Ratio11.8
StarterStarterElectricStarterElectric
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement449 ccmDisplacement449.3 ccm

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width120 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height70 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter17 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width150 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height60 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter17 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,460 mmWheelbase1,475 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height915 mmSeat Height985 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight118 kgDry Weight114 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity8.5 lFuel Tank Capacity8.5 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husqvarna SM 449 R 2012

Husqvarna SM 449 R 2012

Unfortunately, our editors did not test this model.

Husaberg FE 450 2012

Husaberg FE 450 2012

The good old classic among enduros is still the 450 cubic capacity. No other cubic capacity class has as many years under its belt as the 450, and with good reason.

A very old but universal weapon

strong engine.

none

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH