Husaberg TE 125 2012 vs. Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Loading...

Technical Specifications Husaberg TE 125 2012 compared to Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husaberg TE 125 2012
Husqvarna TE 250 2016
Husaberg TE 125 2012
Husaberg TE 125 2012
Husqvarna TE 250 2016
Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore54 mmBore66.4 mm
StrokeStroke54.5 mmStroke72 mm
StarterStarterKickStarterElectric, Kick
Clutch TypeClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bathClutch TypeMultiplate in oil-bath
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes2-StrokeStrokes2-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement124.8 ccmDisplacement249 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic fork
BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Suspension Rear

BrandBrandWPBrandWP

Chassis

FrameFrameSteelFrameSteel
Frame typeFrame typeCentral tubeFrame typeCentral tube

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre widthFront tyre width90 mmFront tyre width90 mm
Front tyre heightFront tyre height90 %Front tyre height90 %
Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre widthRear tyre width120 mmRear tyre width140 mm
Rear tyre heightRear tyre height90 %Rear tyre height80 %
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,475 mmWheelbase1,482 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height990 mmSeat Height960 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight97 kgDry Weight104.4 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity11 lFuel Tank Capacity11 l

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Husaberg TE 125 2012

Husaberg TE 125 2012

The little one with the somewhat nervous temperament joined the Swedish family only last year. The 125 is certainly not the easiest Husaberg to ride, but if you can master the TE 125, you can master all the others.

Feather-light dry weight

nimble on the move.

Chassis needs getting used to

steep ascents complicated.

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Completely new engine for 2017! Lighter and quieter, thanks to the balancer shaft. In terms of responsiveness, the 250 moves more towards 300. The 250 also has significantly more punch in the lower rev range! The limits between 250 and 300 are now vanishingly small.

Price acquisition

price maintenance

performance

handling

unbeatable in hard terrain

I would prefer a four-stroke on smooth and easy tracks

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husaberg TE 125 vs Husqvarna TE 250

Price Husaberg TE 125

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Husqvarna TE 250

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

Husaberg TE 300 2013
VS.
Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husaberg TE 300 2013 vs
Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husaberg TE 250 2013
VS.
Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husaberg TE 250 2013 vs
Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Beta RR 125 2T 2020
VS.
Husaberg TE 125 2013

Beta RR 125 2T 2020 vs
Husaberg TE 125 2013

Beta RR 125 4T 2020
VS.
Husaberg TE 125 2013

Beta RR 125 4T 2020 vs
Husaberg TE 125 2013

Husqvarna TE 250i 2023
VS.
Husqvarna TE 250 2015

Husqvarna TE 250i 2023 vs
Husqvarna TE 250 2015

Husaberg FE 250 2013
VS.
Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husaberg FE 250 2013 vs
Husqvarna TE 250 2016

Husaberg TE 125 2013
VS.
Husqvarna TE 125 2014

Husaberg TE 125 2013 vs
Husqvarna TE 125 2014

Husqvarna TE 250 2017
VS.
Husqvarna FE 350 2018

Husqvarna TE 250 2017 vs
Husqvarna FE 350 2018

Husaberg TE 125 2012
VS.
Aprilia SX 125 Supermoto 2020

Husaberg TE 125 2012 vs
Aprilia SX 125 Supermoto 2020

Husqvarna TE 250R 2013
VS.
Husqvarna TE 250 2011

Husqvarna TE 250R 2013 vs
Husqvarna TE 250 2011

Husqvarna TE 250i 2019
VS.
Husqvarna TE 250 2017

Husqvarna TE 250i 2019 vs
Husqvarna TE 250 2017

KTM 125 EXC 2012
VS.
Husaberg TE 125 2012

KTM 125 EXC 2012 vs
Husaberg TE 125 2012

KTM 250 EXC-F 2017
VS.
Husqvarna TE 250 2016

KTM 250 EXC-F 2017 vs
Husqvarna TE 250 2016