Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 vs. Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

Loading...

Technical Specifications Kawasaki ER-6n 2011 compared to Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011
Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

Engine and Drive Train

Engine powerEngine power72 HPEngine power72 HP
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders2Cylinders2
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
CoolingCoolingliquidCoolingliquid
DisplacementDisplacement649 ccmDisplacement649 ccm

Dimensions and Weights

WheelbaseWheelbase1,410 mmWheelbase1,405 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height790 mmSeat Height785 mm
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity15.5 lFuel Tank Capacity15.5 l
License compliancyLicense compliancyALicense compliancyA

Pros and Cons in comparison

Pros and Cons in comparison

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

Kawasaki ER-6n 2011

You won't find such a coherent package with such fine details anywhere else at this price. The ER-6n has become a little sharper again, both visually and dynamically, and is more fun than ever.

ABS

wider handlebars

slimmer waist

increased intake noise

comfortable seat

uncomplicated chassis.

None

Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

Kawasaki ER-6f 2006

The ER-6f will also be available in Austria as a light motorbike - although young people will tend to go for the cooler ER-6n. Both models, however, are motorbikes that are fun to ride for more than just a few months. The engine is particularly suitable for beginners. There is no need to compromise on comfort, throttle response and load change behaviour.

Comfortable cruising speed up to 180km/h

surprisingly powerful

bold looks

decent build quality

easy handling

great braking system

ABS.

Power flattens out too quickly at very high speed

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Kawasaki ER-6n vs Kawasaki ER-6f

Price Kawasaki ER-6n

Model year
Current average market prices

Price Kawasaki ER-6f

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons