Husqvarna TE 310 2010 vs. Yamaha WR450F 2009

Husqvarna TE 310 2010

Husqvarna TE 310 2010

Yamaha WR450F 2009

Yamaha WR450F 2009

Loading...

Overview - Husqvarna TE 310 2010 vs Yamaha WR450F 2009

Husqvarna TE 310 2010

Husqvarna TE 310 2010

Yamaha WR450F 2009

Yamaha WR450F 2009

Technical Specifications Husqvarna TE 310 2010 compared to Yamaha WR450F 2009

Husqvarna TE 310 2010
Yamaha WR450F 2009

Engine and Drive Train

BoreBore83 mmBore95 mm
StrokeStroke55 mmStroke63.4 mm
Compression RatioCompression Ratio12.9 Compression Ratio12.3
StarterStarterKickStarterKick
TransmissionTransmissionChainTransmissionChain
CylindersCylinders1Cylinders1
StrokesStrokes4-StrokeStrokes4-Stroke
DisplacementDisplacement297 ccmDisplacement449 ccm

Suspension Front

Front suspensionFront suspensionUpside-Down telescopic forkFront suspensionTelescopic fork

Brakes Front

TechnologyTechnologyWaveTechnologyWave

Brakes Rear

TypeTypeDiscTypeDisc

Dimensions and Weights

Front tyre diameterFront tyre diameter21 inchFront tyre diameter21 inch
Rear tyre diameterRear tyre diameter18 inchRear tyre diameter18 inch
WheelbaseWheelbase1,495 mmWheelbase1,500 mm
Seat HeightSeat Height963 mmSeat Height990 mm
Dry WeightDry Weight111 kgDry Weight123.3 kg
Fuel Tank CapacityFuel Tank Capacity7.2 lFuel Tank Capacity8 l

Price Comparison Avarage Market Price Husqvarna TE 310 vs Yamaha WR450F

Price Husqvarna TE 310

Unfortunately, the data available to us is not sufficient to provide meaningful price information for this model.

Price Yamaha WR450F

Model year
Current average market prices

Alternative Comparisons

1000PS Partner

ChigeeContinental MotorradreifenMotorex AGcalimoto GmbH